Accreditation Area Review Deadline Extended

Dear Colleagues, 

Monday’s April 24 due date for Area Reviews has been extended.  Stay tuned for the new due date and please continue working on your Area Reviews. 😉 

Yesterday, Executive Team discussed the effect of the ransomware incident on this effort and acknowledged that not all areas have access to all the data requested in the Area Review.  

We also know that folks are doing so much right now, and we are trying to find ways to ease some of the deadlines but still move forward.  Please stay tuned for more information on that.  We appreciate all that you are doing!!
 
Previous messages around Area Reviews and Accreditation can be found on DAAG here.  

Sincerely,

Ann

April 24 Due Date for Area Reviews (i.e. for Budget Requests & Innovation Grants) 

Dear Colleagues, 

All areas of the College are engaging in Area Reviews (100 reviews to be exact-see Multi-Year Schedule tab!) to review data, do planning such as creating goals, and identify resource needs. The reviews help us understand how effective our own area is and how we can improve.  Area administrators are accountable for completing the reviews by the deadline. 

Earlier deadline: April 24, 2023 

The review process will inform how we allocate resources, which means if your area wants to request additional resources (i.e. funding-including up to $100,000 in Innovation Grants, staffing, or equipment requests beyond the tenure-track positions and instructional equipment that already have been approved in instructional areas), then your area will need to complete a review by the earlier deadline of April 24, 2023, to allow for analysis that will inform the development of the 2023-24 budget. If your instructional or service area is not requesting additional resources, your Area Review is due by the last day of spring quarter on June 16, 2023 and all those areas will be given time to work on those reviews during Day of Learning on May 5th.  

Innovation Grant Requests 

Just to be clear: Innovation Grant funding is available up to $100,000 and the process to apply has been integrated into the Area Review process. That means that the way you apply for an Innovation Grant is to fill out your Area Review by April 24, 2023.  

Why We Are Doing Area Reviews 

This is work that we need to do to be a healthy college, but also because it is required by the Northwest Commission on College and Universities (NWCCU) accreditation standards. Based on the October 2022 accreditation site visit (the most recent visit/accreditation evaluation), the College was found still to be out-of-compliance with accreditation standards in two areas: 

Planning and Use of Data: Provide evidence of a systematic method for collecting, storing, accessing, using and sharing data for the purposes of on-going and systematic evaluation, planning, resource allocation and informing decision-making toward improving institutional effectiveness and achieving mission fulfillment (2020 Standard(s) 1.B.1; 1.B.2). 
 

Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes: Engage in a systematic assessment process for all college programs, including transfer degree programs, through the use of programmatic and institutional outcomes to gather data that will be used for academic learning support, program planning, and resource allocation (Standards 1.C.5, 1.C.6, 1.C.7). 
 

We must show significant progress toward compliance by October 5-6, 2023, our next accreditation site visit. Our accreditation report is due August 24, 2023 which means that we have less than 6 months to enact significant work. 

Continuous Improvement 

This Area Review form and process is a work in process, so provide feedback here to help inform continuous improvements! 

Previous messages around Area Reviews and Accreditation can be found on DAAG here.  

Sincerely, cc

Ann Garnsey-Harter, AVP-PIE 

Accreditation: Spring 2023 Outcomes Assessment follow-up 

Dear Shoreline Faculty, 

This message is a follow-up on the communication from two weeks ago about changes made to the timeline for assessing Shoreline Student Learning Outcomes (SSLOs) and Transfer Program Outcomes (TPOs). The Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) has revised one of its recommendations to specify a need to engage in the assessment of these outcomes in order to address the warning Shoreline has received. To do so, the teams working on developing and revising the SSLOs and TPOs have proposed provisional approval of the following learning outcomes for the purpose of assessment.  

 
Equity and Social Justice SSLO 

Outcome Version #1: Analyze how racial oppression operates in a given contemporary social problem in the United States.  

Outcome Version #2: Identify ways to reduce racial oppression in a given contemporary social problem in the United States. 

 
Critical Thinking SSLO 

Outcome Version #1: Evaluate evidence from different viewpoints or theories, using systematic methods in a particular field or discipline, to draw a reasonable conclusion.  

Outcome Version #2: Apply systematic methods of inquiry from a particular field or discipline to examine a problem, concept, or argument in depth. 

 
AA-DTA Program Outcomes  

Note we will assess two of the following (#4 and #5) in Spring 2023: 

1. Describe differences and similarities in how people across the globe experience social, cultural, economic, or political systems.  

2. Examine the interactions between societies and individuals.  

3. Apply methods of a specific discipline to interpret an expression of the human experience.  

4. Identify methods scientists use to explain aspects of the natural world.  

5. Use scientific laboratory practices within a field or discipline to investigate a scientific concept. 

AS-T Program Outcomes 

1. Demonstrate the use of scientific observation and experimentation to explain aspects of the natural world.  

2. Apply fundamental concepts of a scientific discipline to make reasonable predictions about the natural world.  

Following the process described in my previous message, I am provisionally approving these outcomes for the purpose of assessment. For more information on the process and revisions, please see the provisional approval document. Our collective efforts to assess these outcomes and finalize all outcomes will continue during spring quarter.  

To address NWCCU’s warning, we need to have the following completed by August 24: 

Goal #1: Finalize all SSLOs and TPOs, and publish on the website 

Goal #2: Assess two SSLOs and at least two TPOs, with a plan to discuss results during opening week in September 

Your deans will send a follow-up message explaining what you can expect the learning outcomes team will request from you in spring quarter to help meet these goals. 

Please feel free to direct any questions to Romina Plozza (rplozza@shoreline.edu) or Bayta Maring (bmaring@shoreline.edu). 

Sincerely, 

Phillip J. King, Ed.D. 

Vice President for Student Learning, Equity, and Success 

ACCREDITATION STATUS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs)

The Northwest Commission on College and Universities (NWCCU), Shoreline Community College’s accrediting agency, has issued the College a warning because the College is out-of-compliance with accreditation standards related to planning and with assessment. Below are some Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about what this warning means. 

What does a warning mean? 

A warning is a formal sanction issued by NWCCU to indicate that Shoreline remains out-of-compliance with certain accreditation standards. These standards were cited as out-of-compliance in recommendations given to Shoreline after the Fall 2020 comprehensive accreditation self-study and visit. NWCCU now has given Shoreline two years (until October 2024) to take actions on the recommendations in order to come into compliance with the standards.  

Is the College still accredited? 

Yes!  Shoreline is still a member institution with the NWCCU and remains accredited while addressing this sanction. 

Shoreline has such a stellar reputation for strong programs. How could this happen? 

Shoreline continues to offer high-quality programs and Shoreline students continue to be successful in progressing to the workplace and into four-year degrees. Shoreline just must provide additional and systematic evidence that demonstrates program quality and a continuous improvement cycle. The question is not whether Shoreline has quality programs, but how the College is using data to measure the learning in our programs, assess our efforts, and make improvements to our programs and the College as a whole. We look forward to sharing this evidence with NWCCU and with the community on our Accreditation webpage

How serious is this? 

Shoreline is taking this warning very seriously; faculty, staff, and administrators have come together to build the knowledge and skills needed to provide evidence of program quality, systematic planning, and continuous improvement. NWCCU’s action has led to a new era for Shoreline in the way we use data to inform our work. 

The good news is that the College has been building tools and processes related to using data for planning, assessment, and improvement for many years. The College’s ability to meet the standards has been hindered by the COVID-19 pandemic and the implementation of a new statewide data system, called ctcLink. While we are taking the warning seriously, we are completely confident that we will come into compliance by October 2024. 

You mentioned standards Shoreline is not meeting – what are those? 

The US Department of Education commissions regional agencies to evaluate colleges and universities based on a set of standards.  Our regional accreditors, the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU), establish those standards. The two recommendations Shoreline needs to address to come into compliance are: 

  • “Provide evidence of a systematic method for collecting, storing, accessing, using and sharing data for the purposes of on-going and systematic evaluation, planning, resource allocation and informing decision-making toward improving institutional effectiveness and achieving mission fulfillment. (Standards 1.B.1, 1.B.2)” 
  • “Engage in a systematic assessment process for all college programs, including transfer degree programs, through the use of programmatic and institutional outcomes to gather data that will be used for academic learning support, program planning, and resource allocation. (Standards 1.C.5, 1.C.6, 1.C.7)” 

What is the College doing to come into compliance? 

Shoreline has made two significant enhancements of existing processes to address the two recommendations: 

  • While the College has engaged in strategic and operational planning for many years, an annual calendar and process has been created in which all areas of the College review data, build goals and plans, and identify resources needs. Every fall quarter, all areas (service and instructional) will review key data points and metrics and submit an area review, along with any resource/budget requests, in winter quarter. This review process will be transparent and inclusive, with employees in each area invited to participate. The data-informed reviews will inform budget development in spring quarter. This cycle began in 2022-2023 using an accelerated calendar and will continue as an ongoing planning practice following a  multi-year calendar that has been created. 
  • Shoreline needs to provide direct evidence that students are gaining the skills and knowledge they need to be successful. This type of data collection and reflection is called learning outcomes assessment, and also informs instructional planning and ongoing improvement. Shoreline has been working for over five years building tools, resources, and training for faculty to assess learning outcomes in individual courses (Course Learning Outcomes), entire programs (Program Learning Outcomes), and across the entire student body (Shoreline Student Learning Outcomes).  

Learning outcomes assessment now will occur on an annual cycle with each department assessing outcomes of core courses, each academic program assessing program outcomes, and the faculty at large assessing college-wide outcomes. So far, over 100 Shoreline faculty have participated in learning outcomes assessment in some form as assessment has become a regular and ongoing practice for Shoreline instructors. 

Also, see recent campus announcements related to Accreditation on Day At a Glance. 

Questions or comments? 

Contact the College’s Accreditation Liaison Officer, Ann Garnsey-Harter, agarnsey@shoreline.edu .  

Day of Learning- Update

Greeting Shoreline Community,

The Day of Learning (DOL) marks a unique opportunity for the College to connect and learn together. We have numerous reasons to connect and continue building community with the distance we have experienced over the past few years. With the recent letter from our accrediting commission (NWCCU), we also have a very compelling reason to focus our collective learning on strategic planning and the accreditation process. In the spirit of transparency and collaboration, all members of our community are impacted by the actions we will take to address the recommendations the NWCCU put forward to be addressed. As such, working alongside one another to advance the efforts of our College is advantageous for every member of our vibrant community.

Through many meetings and at the recommendation of Melanie Dixon, the Vice President of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, & Accessibility (DEIA), and with the support of Executive Team, we are updating the theme of Day of Learning to be more inclusive of our strategic plan initiatives as they align with accreditation training and implementation. This shift in theme allows us to refocus portions of the day on much-needed topics around accreditation requirements, accreditation training, and implementation, and strategic enrollment management activities. It is a priority that the campus community is knowledgeable on these topics and can support the work to be done. A college-wide learning event is the perfect setting to address these time-sensitive topics.

This does not mean shifting the focus away from DEIA, but rather centering it at the heart of our planning processes and, thus, making DEIA the highest priority of the institution. Our strategic planning and accreditation improvements will enable us to be more accountable to our DEIA goals. Our community will have the rare opportunity to anchor all college efforts in DEIA to close obligation gaps for our more-than-worthy students and to be responsive to the accreditation recommendations. Addressing inequities at the system level will allow Shoreline to step back into the leadership role of DEIA for our system to enhance the lives of all students.

We will be working with the Day of Learning Committee to revisit the call for proposals to make a slight pivot, while honoring the intent of the submissions.

Please stay tuned for more information.

Thank you for your support and participation as we make this event meaningful for our employees as well as addressing institutional priorities.

Sincerely,

President Jack Kahn